Henry VI was a pain, and Richard II was NOT Richard III….!

Henry VI

Henry VI is not my favourite king, in fact I think he was a real pain in the posterior, whether in his lucid moments or not. This link is to a paper about him, which I confess to not having finished because I lost faith in its accuracy. No fewer than three times Richard II is referred to as Richard III, and I’m surprised the error not only got through to publication but hasn’t been corrected. Perhaps the latter action isn’t possible, I don’t really know. But the blooper certainly spoiled the paper for me.

And my low opinion of Henry VI remains the same.


Subscribe to my newsletter

  1. The political marriage of his parents clearly brought the Valois madness to England in the form of their son. Just as well his lineage was killed off (if his son was truly his son of which there are reasonable doubts.)

    Liked by 1 person

  2. […] me thus far) we have Edward Of Westminster. There was a mention of whether or not he really was Henry VI’s son, but the conclusion was that if Henry acknowledged him, then he was. Which, legally, was […]

    Like

  3. […] Oh dear. That’s pretty damning. Another dimwit Henry, like number VI. […]

    Like

  4. […] which finishes with the reign of Henry VI. So who’s this Sir John Stanley who was around in 1463? The only one I can think of was the […]

    Like

  5. […] Richard of Gloucester. The execution of the Lancastrians after Tewkesbury? Richard’s fault. Henry VI‘s murder? Richard did it. Of course he did! Edward IV had planned to send Henry to a nice […]

    Like

  6. […] Buxhill and everyone else involved in the deed, and made very pointed and deliberate exceptions of the king, the Princess of Wales and Lancaster, as if he strongly suspected them of having a hand in it all […]

    Like

Leave a reply to Tyrants – Part 3 – murreyandblue Cancel reply