The New Murrey and Blue blog

Henry VI was a pain, and Richard II was NOT Richard III….!

, ,
, , , ,
Henry VI

Henry VI is not my favourite king, in fact I think he was a real pain in the posterior, whether in his lucid moments or not. This link is to a paper about him, which I confess to not having finished because I lost faith in its accuracy. No fewer than three times Richard II is referred to as Richard III, and I’m surprised the error not only got through to publication but hasn’t been corrected. Perhaps the latter action isn’t possible, I don’t really know. But the blooper certainly spoiled the paper for me.

And my low opinion of Henry VI remains the same.

Subscribe to my newsletter

  1. marliesemd Avatar
    marliesemd

    The political marriage of his parents clearly brought the Valois madness to England in the form of their son. Just as well his lineage was killed off (if his son was truly his son of which there are reasonable doubts.)

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply
  2. Salon Privé, a magazine with interesting articles about some of “our” historic figures…. – murreyandblue

    […] me thus far) we have Edward Of Westminster. There was a mention of whether or not he really was Henry VI’s son, but the conclusion was that if Henry acknowledged him, then he was. Which, legally, was […]

    Like

    Reply
  3. Was Henry III a good, bad or indifferent king….? – murreyandblue

    […] Oh dear. That’s pretty damning. Another dimwit Henry, like number VI. […]

    Like

    Reply
  4. The Murderous Stanleys of 15th-century Lancashire…. – murreyandblue

    […] which finishes with the reign of Henry VI. So who’s this Sir John Stanley who was around in 1463? The only one I can think of was the […]

    Like

    Reply
  5. Tyrants – Part 3 – murreyandblue

    […] Richard of Gloucester. The execution of the Lancastrians after Tewkesbury? Richard’s fault. Henry VI‘s murder? Richard did it. Of course he did! Edward IV had planned to send Henry to a nice […]

    Like

    Reply
  6. Did Edward IV violate sanctuary after the Battle of Tewkesbury….? – murreyandblue

    […] Buxhill and everyone else involved in the deed, and made very pointed and deliberate exceptions of the king, the Princess of Wales and Lancaster, as if he strongly suspected them of having a hand in it all […]

    Like

    Reply

Leave a reply to marliesemd Cancel reply