from the link below

My introduction to the Battle of Shrewsbury was at school, when Shakespeare’s Henry IV Part I had to be studied for ‘O’ levels. I didn’t like Henry IV then, and I don’t like him now. He was a usurper who murdered his cousin Richard II in order to plant his Lancastrian backside on the stolen throne. That’s him in a nutshell.

Now, if you go to this link you’ll find a video by History Hit of a documentary in which Dan Jones and Professor Michael Livingston examine the battle. The article about this is interesting, although I am a little concerned that Edmund Mortimer is referred to as Edward. Such errors always make me jittery about the accuracy of everything else.

‘Battle of Shrewsbury’, an illustration from Thomas Pennant’s ‘A tour in Wales’, 1781. Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons / Thomas Pennant / National Library of Wales / Public Domain

 


Subscribe to my newsletter

  1. Shrewsbury could so easily have been Henry IV’s Bosworth. Imagine what would have been said about him had he lost!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. […] and Worcester eventually caught up with Henry at Shrewsbury and were taken into his peace without much fuss, although Henry had already granted the […]

    Like

Leave a reply to sighthound6 Cancel reply