This time, Philippa Langley and her team have discovered proof that both the “Princes” survived into 1487, by which time Henry “Tudor” had re-legitimated them both by repealing the original Titulus Regiuss unread. Both went on to challenge Henry, albeit unsuccessfully. The evidence, verified by the likes of Dr. Janina Ramirez, includes:

An invoice from Maximilian I for the weapons he supplied to Edward V for his 1487 invasion and a promise to pay Albert of Saxony 30,000 florins on his accession.
A diary entry from Richard of Shrewsbury showing how the Duke of Norfolk assisted in his escape, similar to “Perkin”‘s better-known “a certain lord” account and clearly identifying them as the same man.

All of them came from sources on the continent., where Henry VII’s word was unimportant and that the Human Shredder could not reach. It is apparent that both “Princes” spent some time in the Channel Islands, Pontefract Castle and possibly Gipping Hall. Furthermore, Edward may have died at Stoke Field but could easily have survived to become Sir John Evans, the Coldridge parker, where the Yorkist chapel exists, as the interview on “Gone Mediaeval” makes clear.

So here we have similar research to that undertaken by Fields, Ashdown-Hill, Carson and Lewis but it has gone a little further and uncovered some important documentary proof. The Missing Princes Project will carry on from here, as there are many loose ends.


Subscribe to my newsletter

  1. […] pretenders are particularly famous, especially at the moment with Philippa Langley’s amazing new discoveries about the real fate of the “Princes in the Tower”. If they weren’t disposed of by Uncle […]

    Like

  2. […] the least of the interesting facts that emerge from Philippa Langley’s new book is that in August/September 1499, Margaret of Burgundy wrote a formal apology to Henry VII in an […]

    Like

  3. […] and admiration abound for Philippa Langley’s new discoveries and the book that tells all about the work she and her colleagues have been doing to trace what […]

    Like

  4. […] III,  has given an in depth assessment of the document with researcher Nathalie in her book ‘The Princes in the Tower’ which I would recommend to anyone with an open mind who is willing to cast aside old outdated […]

    Like

  5. […] it had, the Missing Princes Project‘s interim findings would show that: 1) The former Edward V would have been restored, […]

    Like

Leave a reply to An Inconvenient Fact for ‘Traditionalists’ – murreyandblue Cancel reply