Weir(d) Babies (4): Edward I and Eleanor of Castile

Yes, it’s Weir(d) Babies 4 here, and another post poking fun at a certain “historian” who seem to pull royal babies out of thin air and include them in genealogies. This time, the extraneous little cherubs were credited to that notably fertile pair, Edward I and Eleanor of Castile…as if they did not already have a humungous brood!

Three girls, Alice, Blanche and Beatrice, are surprising additions to this royal family. Now Eleanor and Edward DID have several daughters who were stillborn or who died in infancy but their names did not survive in history. One was possibly called ‘Juliana’ but the evidence for that name is pretty flimsy too. The other three, though, seem to be complete inventions. Some claim the mysterious ‘Alice’ was a twin to Joan, but this is also pretty darn unlikely as the birth year listed for ‘Alice’ is not the same as Joan’s!

So here are some disgusted (and disgusting looking) medieval babies here to register their disapproval of these ‘creative’ inventions…


Subscribe to my newsletter

  1. […] Passing of Eleanor’ –  artist’s impression of the funeral cortège of Eleanor of Castile watched over by her grieving husband, Edward I.  Artist Frank Salisbury, 1910 […]

    Like

  2. […] Elizabeth Woodville, Sarah Gristwood of Anne Neville, Dr Elizabeth Norton of Margaret Beaufort, and Alison Weir of Elizabeth of […]

    Like

  3. […] Thus I learned that hallmarks on gold date back to around 1180 and Henry II. On silver it was Edward I in 1300. So it started in […]

    Like

Leave a reply to Talks about the ladies of the Wars of the Roses…. – murreyandblue Cancel reply