Henry VII

There are some interesting occurrences in Welsh history, not all of them well known. When I came upon this article, I looked for Henry VII. Well, he was bound to feature. And he did! I quote:

“….Numerous [Welsh] rebellions still arose, most famously that led by Owain Glyndwr….The Glyndwr Rising would lead to the Penal Laws, which forbade Welshmen from bearing arms and holding senior public offices….They also prohibited public assembly and limited the education of Welsh children and generally made the Welsh second-class citizens in their own country….Rather than repealing these laws, in the latter years of his reign, nearly 20 years after his victory at Bosworth, HENRY VII ALLOWED CHARTERS TO BE PURCHASED, at the cost of £2,000 (a high price in those days) by lordships and principalities to bypass the laws for Welsh communities….”

Oh, well done, Henners…my only surprise is that it took you so long to dream this one up. I mean, when it came to robbery and money-making, you were peerless! Or why not simply ride roughshod over the laws? After all, that’s how you stole your throne in the first place. But no, you found a way of using them to your advantage. It would clearly have been too much to ask that you did the right thing and repealed them, because you sussed that by leaving them in place you could make more money. M.o.n.e.y. I’ll bet you slept soundly that night—one of the few when your endless paranoia didn’t keep you up and pacing with dread and indigestion.

I guess that once you got your crown, your “Welshness” was redundant. You certainly didn’t do much for Wales.

 


Subscribe to my newsletter

  1. […] this sounds familiar, yes, of course, because if you fast-forward a century, you have Henry VII, the first Tudor, justifying his similar action. Challenge for the throne, murder the incumbent and […]

    Like

  2. […] are showing, and maybe they are. I seldom miss an opportunity to take pops at the Tudor Weasel. Henry VII was never a dish of culinary perfection, no matter how slavishly his propagandists….um, […]

    Liked by 1 person

  3. […] live the new king? Ye gods. Henry VII may have been an unpleasant, money-grubbing, paranoid gargoyle, but his son was a true MONSTER. […]

    Liked by 1 person

  4. […] readiness for her son’s future bride’s stay there (2).    However in 1486 on the order of Henry VII,  Edward now aged 11,  was sent to the Tower of London where he would live out the remainder of […]

    Liked by 1 person

  5. […] them in his play Macbeth. This is unsurprising however, as Elizabeth’s grandfather, Henry VII, had reintroduced the concept in the late 15th […]

    Liked by 1 person

  6. […] a victory for treachery – and for cowardice, because Henry Tudor didn’t raise a finger, but lurked at the back, behind a protective screen of […]

    Liked by 1 person

  7. […] is known is that the throne he was after was occupied by the Tudor usurper, Henry VII. A rebel Yorkist army was raised, and restitution was sought. As this site this site points out: […]

    Like

  8. […] my own example. From birth, Henry Tydder was the rightful king of England. It’s true, I tell you, I remember […]

    Like

  9. […] Rivers. As a servant the child was not a claimant to the Woodville inheritance which was King Henry VII‘s goal (Henry was impatient to inherit the remainder of the Woodville money and estates he […]

    Like

  10. […] the one that really made me laugh was the suggestion for Henry VII. “….I’d give Henry VII cash because no matter what I gave him, he’d return it […]

    Like

  11. […] More did! He got his information from a man who loathed Richard III, and who grovelled before Henry Tudor and his sanctimonious troll of a mother, Margaret Beaufort. Morton could indeed be relied […]

    Like

Leave a reply to My reaction to Lucy Worsley’s Christmas Carol Odyssey…. – murreyandblue Cancel reply