Is this the sword of John de la Pole, Earl of Lincoln….?

 

found on Pinterest

Thanks to a question and response on the Richard III’s Loyal Supporters Unaffiliated Facebook group, and another reference on Twitter, I’ve learned that the sword of John de la Pole, Earl of Lincoln, was presented to the city of Lincoln by Henry VII after the Battle of Stoke in 1487.

At least, tradition names it as the earl’s sword, it resides at the Guildhall in Lincoln and is still carried at ceremonial events. If anyone has more details I’d love to hear.

source unknown

 


Subscribe to my newsletter

  1. I was given a tour of the Guildhall a couple of years ago and the man described it as the sword that killed John de la Pole, not the sword owned by him. They also own a charter of Richard’s concerning the city dated 30th Nov 1484, which my guide pulled out in a drawer.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. If it’s the sword of the man who killed Lincoln, I wonder what happened to him? Henry VII wouldn’t have been pleased because he wanted Lincoln and other Yorkist leaders taken alive.

    Like

  3. Jo Quarcoopome Avatar
    Jo Quarcoopome

    Yes, HVII was most ungruntled that Lincoln was killed as he wanted to ascertain “the bottom of his danger”. Would he have had Lincoln tortured to get the info?

    Like

  4. Yes, I think Henry would…and Lincoln’s rebellion gave him just the excuse he needed. Not that I have faith in enry’s scruples anyway, but he did try (or seem to try)to get Lincoln on side in the beginning. But it’s my guess that Henry was just looking for a “justifiable” reason to set about Lincoln. So I think the man who actually did the killing at Stoke Field would have been wise to make himself scarce!

    Like

  5. […] knows who Richard wished to be his heir, and it seems much more likely to have been another nephew, John de la Pole, Earl of Lincoln, son of Richard’s sister. To nominate Warwick would actually have been to concede that Warwick […]

    Like

  6. […] than the more usual symbolism. I felt a little sad, however, that John and Elizabeth’s son, John, Earl of Lincoln, who died at the battle of Stoke Field, is not lying near his parents–or, indeed, has any […]

    Like

  7. […] it was going to open a very unpleasant can of worms for Henry.   This fact may also have focussed Lincoln’s mind on the fact that as Edward V was now legitimised he would have been the rightful king and […]

    Like

  8. […] she lived there with her sisters, Richard’s own son, the Earl of Warwick and his sister, the Earl of Lincoln and his unmarried siblings plus any other royal […]

    Like

  9. […] who would have accompanied the young Edward to Dublin?  Certainly not fellow Yorkist rebels, Lincoln and Lovell for they arrived in Dublin after the arrival of the young lad who was about to be […]

    Like

  10. […] upon Hull, who would become Lord Chancellor and 1st Earl of Suffolk during the reign of Richard II. John de la Pole, Earl of Lincoln, was Richard III’s much trusted nephew, of course. So this amazing old house has a history […]

    Like

  11. […] who was about to be banished. The de la Poles, of course, had been a thorn in Henry’s side, John de la Pole, Earl of Lincoln, being misguided enough to be on Richard III’s side. Henry wasn’t one to forgive such […]

    Like

  12. […] with Lovell and the Stafford brothers of Grantham in their first rebellion and definitely was with Lincoln and Lovell at Stoke Field, as was his cousin John, Baron Scrope of Bolton. Both nobles were […]

    Like

  13. […] the House of York and the destruction of its last leaders –  but mostly the lost burial place of John de la Pole, Earl of Lincoln (c.1460-1487) whose parents were John de La Pole,  Duke of Suffolk and Elizabeth Plantagenet, […]

    Like

  14. […] when we think of the Battle of East Stoke in 1487. With this defeat, and the death of the young Earl of Lincoln, who was regarded as the heir of Richard III, Henry Tudor was more firmly on his stolen […]

    Like

  15. […] my knowledge there is nowhere called Oakhanger in Kent, let alone that it was held by the Earl of Lincoln. I have invented it solely for the purposes of my story. Otherwise, everywhere and everyone in the […]

    Like

  16. […] is a Yorkist fairy tale for Christmas. There is no proof that John de la Pole, Earl of Lincoln, fought at Bosworth, or about what really happened to the sons of Edward IV—until the recent […]

    Like

  17. […] A ring and a coin from 1725 have been found in the well, but the ring is undated. The other discovery is what is said to be either a sword or a sheath. The image below shows this item, and is the only image I’ve been able to find. It’s from this site. I’m no expert, but it looks like a long blade, and so is presumably that of a sword. […]

    Like

Leave a comment