lucy-in-armour

Did anyone watch the second episode of Lucy Worsley’s fib-busting series last night? I didn’t quite make it to the end because I was so tired, but saw enough to understand that she did to James VII/II exactly what she did with Richard III. By that I mean she concentrated on the deeds/misdeeds of the winning side. Like Richard, James II became no clearer as a man and king as the programme progressed. James was Catholic and “unpopular in a Protestant country”. Full stop.

We were shown the letter from a handful of peers that “invited” William III to visit Britain and some Dutch archivists explained how it would aid his campaign against Louis XIV, another Catholic. Lucy explained just how laughably improbable the “warming pan” stories were and how James Francis Edward’s birth would stop the Catholic monarchy from just dying out when his father passed away, as he did within thirteen years of his dethronement. William’s propaganda emphasised that his coup, from his landing at Brixham, was bloodless. This was true in England but not in Scotland and Ireland, where James and his supporters fought back, as you can see here.

Lucy was as watchable as ever, cheeky and entertaining. And when she was dressed up, she was delightfully sleek. I continue to love whatever she does.

You can read about this second episode in the series here.


Subscribe to my newsletter

  1. […] Worsley, having covered the Wars of the Roses, the “Glorious Revolution” and Britain in India, has returned with a further series. This time, the episodes earlier […]

    Like

  2. […] was merely a notion circulating in 17th-century Ireland (where it is was soon to be ascribed to James II), and John of Ormond had been unhappy with the date for some other reason altogether. Or perhaps […]

    Like

  3. […] Mary is credited with being the only Queen Mary, when the article also concerns itself with William and Mary. The second Mary gets a mention, however, so I can’t understand the “only Mary” […]

    Like

  4. […] of Orange – a song about the Glorious Revolution of […]

    Like

  5. […] We can see here that the 11th Duke, Charles, married Frances Fitzroy-Scudamore, a descendant of Charles II, but they had no sons. There is also Lavinia Strutt, who married the 16th Duke, but they too had no sons and the other duchesses cannot be connected to the Merry Monarch, nor yet to James II. […]

    Like

  6. […] you know them all, but the one on which I came a cropper was number seven, the Be-Shtten – James II. Or James the Sht.  Good grief! […]

    Like

Leave a reply to Sassanachs don’t Like Mondays (allegedly) – murreyandblue Cancel reply