Here’s one to avoid, I think. The picture with the Times Literary Supplement review is the Delaroche daub of the two golden-haired little angels cowering on their bed in dread of Wicked Uncle Richard’s murderous intentions. Natch. Such an appealing little scene, is it not? Why are so many people utterly determined to pin such crimes on Richard? As for him being a bad king…! That is such a preposterously incorrect judgement that it’s almost laughable.
This sort of book only hardens my resolve to support Richard, and I’m sure it will have the same effect on everyone else of an enlightened frame of mind. Onward and upward, my friends. We’ll vindicate our king in the end!
So I’ve posted this with a shamelessly Arthurian view of Richard. Sir Galahad at the very least. Here’s one in the eye for Mr Horspool!
Richard atSunrise.1.

Subscribe to my newsletter

  1. Rosemarie de Boyer Avatar
    Rosemarie de Boyer

    As I have said before two steps forward one and a half steps back. Perhaps if Westminster allows the urn to be investigated and proved once and for all it is a mismatch of animal bones and what ever else we prove missing bodies is not a murder

    Liked by 3 people

  2. And, apparently. Richard’s skeleton was excavated by Jo Appleby – all on her own? No mention of Philippa Langley or that Appleby put a mattock through his skull 😦

    Liked by 1 person

  3. And what’s all this about?!

    “Even before he became king, Richard interfered in Scotland, supporting the rebellious duke of Albany”

    Edward had nothing to do with it, it seems! Dreadful article!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment