We know from the resulting petition from the Three Estates that this followed the testimony of Robert Stillington, Bishop of Bath and Wells. So, if there was anything untoward about the process, how was this prelate rewarded by the new King?

A list of Edward IV’s council members is attached to this post but it is the clerical members that are of interest here:
Bourchier, Archbishop of Canterbury was elderly and unwell by summer 1483 and died in March 1486. Both Laud and Carey, who were later Bishops of Bath and Wells, were eventually translated to Canterbury and Bourchier could have been persuaded to retire in favour of Stillington – but he wasn’t.
Thomas Kempe, the long-serving Bishop of London famous to fans of 1970s children’s literature, was to die in 1489 and may also have been ill. Had Stillington been appointed in his stead, this would have been a promotion, but it didn’t happen.
Thomas Rotheram, Archbishop of York, was often out of favour and Richard may have found an excuse to deprive him. Wolsey was Bishop of Bath and Wells in the following century before becoming primate of the northern province but Stillington wasn’t to take the same journey.
John Morton, Bishop of Ely, was arrested after the Hastings plot and could easily have been deprived for treason – if Richard had wanted to behave like a Lancastrian or “Tudor”. This didn’t happen either.

In fact, Stillington was not rewarded at all by Richard III because he had only revealed a fact that he should have done – a fact that had led to the executions of two of the Duchess of Norfolk’s servants and, arguably, of the Duke of Clarence. The Bishop himself had been imprisoned for his knowledge and was to be again, only his ecclesiastical status possibly saving his life.

All that he had done was to tell the simple truth as it stood.


Subscribe to my newsletter

15 responses to “The exposure of Edward IV’s bigamy”

  1. a fact that had led to the executions of two of the Duchess of Norfolk’s servants – I missed this, is it in JAH’s “Eleanor”?

    Like

    1. See “A mystery from 1468” from last May.

      Like

  2. […] might also have known about Edward IV’s pre-contract with Lady Eleanor Talbot…which was what made Edward’s sons and daughter illegitimate […]

    Like

  3. […] Leslau, Clement was actually Richard, who had been Duke of York until his father’s bigamy was exposed and Lewis fully explores this hypothesis (2). Clement, during his second Low Countries exile, died […]

    Like

  4. […] say, is history. We have Richard planning his nephew’s coronation, the truth about Edward IV’s pre-contract with Eleanor Talbot coming out, the realisation that Elizabeth’s children by Edward were […]

    Like

  5. […] into a precontract with someone else, Lady Eleanor Talbot. This awkward tangle meant that Elizabeth wasn’t really married to Edward at all, she was his mistress, and all their children were therefore […]

    Like

  6. […] he “knew” that Edward IV hadn’t committed bigamy, why did he not “induce” Stillington to sign a confession, instead of imprisoning him […]

    Like

  7. […] Baring-Gould, as we showed here  – therefore through double illegitimacy via Henry and Edward IV. Josh’s great-grandmother Mary was Sabine’s granddaughter and Charles Baring was one of […]

    Like

  8. […] June 1483, as we all know, the Three Estates of England met, declared the throne vacant due to the illegitimacy of Edward IV’s offspring. They also decided that the Duke of Clarence‘s children were […]

    Like

  9. […] his brother Edward IV’s marriage was illegal, then the children were illegitimate. Illegitimate children were barred from the throne. Richard […]

    Like

  10. […] Black Death, Wilton Diptych, Piers Plowman, Chaucer, Julian of Norwich, Margery Kempe, the East Window at York Minster and Death and the Gallant; The Reformation and rival queens, […]

    Like

  11. […] Borthwick Institute, Archbishops of York’s Registers No. 23 (Thomas Rotherham), ff. 244r-245r. It should be noted that the published summary, in J.W. Clay and J. Raine, […]

    Like

  12. […] It must be understood that this was an age with only minimal forms of communication and virtually no record-keeping. However, most people lived in a ‘community’ where everyone knew them. This was as true of the medieval nobility – a small clique of families – as it was of the residents of a village or the county ‘community’ of the gentry. The point was, everyone knew who you were, and your antecedents, and could come forward to object if something was wrong. For example, if one of the parties had a living wife or husband. […]

    Like

  13. […] is important to note that Sir Adam did not commit bigamy and nor did he call Agnes his wife during his first wife’s […]

    Like

  14. […] other episodes include bigamy in Canada (as with Bruce Forsyth’s ancestor in the USA), a form of minor honour in the […]

    Like

Leave a reply to The art that made us – murreyandblue Cancel reply