The New Murrey and Blue blog

Straight from the horse’s mouth?

, , ,
, , , , , , , , , , ,

……… in which Dr. John Ashdown-Hill, who located the mtDNA match, tells nerdalicious what these findings really mean, not what the Cairo brigade (eg Hicks, Dan Jones and their acolytes) are already twisting them to mean:

What do King Richard III’s Latest DNA Results Really Prove?

1) Given that Richard III is only four generations down from Edward III, whilst the Somerset samples are about twenty down, they are about five times as likely to contain the “milkman”‘s DNA. In the interview, he even mentions the John of Gaunt – John Beaufort “connection” as a possibility for the broken link, which would substitute the (mere gentleman) Sir Hugh Swynford for Gaunt.
2) One of the live Somerset “cousins”, descended from the 5th Duke of Beaufort, doesn’t match the others, suggesting that the broken link could be quite recent, as well as the extra one this shows.

Subscribe to my newsletter

20 responses to “Straight from the horse’s mouth?”

  1. Ed Avatar
    Ed

    “The Cairo brigade (eg Hicks, Dan Jones and their acolytes)”… what a cretinous statement. Even if you disagree with their opinions (which, as examples are very bad anyway, since they do not support each other), you should show some respect for basic professionalism. Anne Sutton would be ashamed of you.

    Like

    Reply
  2. kbinldo Avatar
    kbinldo

    Mutations in the Y-Chromosome would not lead to a change in the Haplogroup itself.

    Like

    Reply
  3. super blue Avatar
    super blue

    True.

    Like

    Reply
  4. If Edward IV didn’t dispose of Henry Holand, 3rd Duke of Exeter, who did….? | murreyandblue

    […] in 1439 at Fotheringhay. She was the elder sister of Kings Edward IV and Richard III, and it was her mitochondrial DNA that proved the remains discovered in Leicester were those of Richard […]

    Like

    Reply
  5. The Sitwells | murreyandblue

    […] Sitwell’s ancestry is through the early Dukes of Beaufort – the family who are theoretically descended in the male line from Edward III, but not necessarily. The first Duke, as you can see, married the […]

    Like

    Reply
  6. The children of Barnard Castle delve into history…. | murreyandblue

    […] Harriet Tatton said pupils were led on a path of discovery into how scientists used DNA testing to confirm they had discovered King Richard III’s body in […]

    Like

    Reply
  7. Desperately Seeking Wolsey…. | murreyandblue

    […] discovery in Leicester of the remains of Richard III was surely one of the greatest such event, and since then there have been increased attempts to […]

    Like

    Reply
  8. Combining genetics with genealogy to identify the dead in unmarked graves…. | murreyandblue

    […] samples of DNA in the hope of locating someone of historic interest? After all, it’s how Michael Ibsen’s descent from Richard’s sister was […]

    Like

    Reply
  9. A King under a Post Office? | murreyandblue

    […] article, dating from just nine days after Richard III’s remains were officially identified, speculates on where Balliol, son of a Scots king like his rival, is likely to be buried in or […]

    Like

    Reply
  10. Two butchers, an archer and a “bourgeois of Tournai”…. – murreyandblue

    […] regarding children: A 2014 Y-DNA study compared the DNA of Edward III’s descendants, namely Richard III and 5 men descended from Henry Somerset, 2nd Earl of Worcester. Richard III […]

    Like

    Reply
  11. The forensic genealogy that identified Richard III moves on apace – murreyandblue

    […] six years ago now, it was confirmed that the remains identified under a car park in Leicester were those of Richard III. One of the […]

    Like

    Reply
  12. Professor Turi King has written a new book about DNA…. – murreyandblue

    […] sell well. Which it will, because Professor King’s work on showing that the remains in Leicester are indeed those of Richard III, have brought her to a worldwide stage far greater than might otherwise have been the case. Not […]

    Like

    Reply
  13. Michael Portillo’s Great Coastal Railway Journeys and Pembroke Castle – murreyandblue

    […] about Catherine of Valois, mother to Edmund and Jasper Tudor, in his book Royal Marriage Secrets John Ashdown-Hill writes “within two years of her husband’s death she had apparently begun to form an amorous […]

    Like

    Reply
  14. Identifying another King – murreyandblue

    […] of course, several parallels with Richard III here, although his Y-chromosome is inconclusive and his mtDNA was conclusive. Those who are ostensibly descended from Robert I and / or his brother Edward, […]

    Like

    Reply
  15. In the teeth of the evidence – murreyandblue

    […] named Dominic Selwood disputes the identity of Richard III’s remains, despite the mtDNA match with collateral descendants in Canada and Australia, their height, age of death, era of death, […]

    Like

    Reply
  16. Oliver Cromwell’s posthumous peregrinations – murreyandblue

    […] Barton also discusses the movement of the head over the years, almost like that of Eva Peron, together with the cumulative evidence of the head’s identity: the age, sex, facial hair and warts, similar to that in the case of Richard III’s remains. […]

    Like

    Reply
  17. Another Richard III musical? – murreyandblue

    […] As you will have observed, a lot has happened since Newley’s death in 1999, not least finding Richard’s real grave and reburying […]

    Like

    Reply
  18. If Edward IV didn’t dispose of Henry Holand, 3rd Duke of Exeter, who did….? – murreyandblue

    […] in 1439 at Fotheringhay. She was the elder sister of Kings Edward IV and Richard III, and it was her mitochondrial DNA that proved the remains discovered in Leicester were those of Richard […]

    Like

    Reply
  19. Henry Beaufort, Duke of Somerset and his siblings – murreyandblue

    […] but he had a son, Charles, with a woman called Joan Hill of whom little is known. The present Duke of Beaufort is a […]

    Like

    Reply
  20. Only reading half the evidence … – murreyandblue

    […] Hilariously, even one of this Duke’s “descendants” isn’t, as shown here. […]

    Like

    Reply

Leave a reply to If Edward IV didn’t dispose of Henry Holand, 3rd Duke of Exeter, who did….? | murreyandblue Cancel reply