Here is another little puzzle to thwart my writing intentions. Always liking some background âcolourâ, I started chasing up the armorial devices of the Chadertons of Lancashire. I discovered the main one featured a griffin. So I resorted to my copy of The Royal Armory (the weight of which tests my aging muscles!)
There I found the following: Chaderton. Argent, a griffinâs head segreant gules. Their crest was also a griffinâs head.
Right, the first thing was to find out what, exactly, segreant means. Iâve come upon many heraldic terms, but this was a new one to me. According to Wikipedia: â….A creature segreant has both forelegs raised in the air, as a beast rampant, with wings addorsed and elevated. This term is reserved to winged quadrupeds (such as griffins and dragons). It is of uncertain etymology; it is first recorded as sergreant in the 16th century….â (The spelling sergreant appears to be wrong, or only 16th-century – The Royal Armory omits the first ârâ.)
Well, that all seems clear enough. The Chadertonsâ coat-of-arms was a red griffinâs head on a silver ground. But it was segreant. Um, I donât want to appear picky, but how can a griffinâs HEAD be segreant? Does it mean the griffinâs head actually included its raised forelegs? The same with the crest?
Help please? Heraldry is definitely NOT my strong point. (Not that you’d notice, of course!)

Leave a comment